| Share prices |
All Exxaro’s South African operations have environmental management programmes (EMPs) as required under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) and the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). While a record number of integrated water use licences were approved in the review period, the Department of Water Affairs directed the Arnot Mooifontein open-cast operation to cease using a haul road constructed over a water course. The Department of Mineral Resources directed North Block Complex’s Glisa operation to update and submit its EMPR. Both directives have been fully complied with. North Block Complex’s EMP is being updated to align all activities with environmental management plan reporting requirements, while the EMP amendment to Arnot’s Mooifontein operation is being considered by the authorities. All EMPs are key indicators in ensuring that Exxaro remains a sustainable business. Exxaro also adopts the precautionary principle entrenched in NEMA in evaluating all the environmental impacts of business opportunities.
To enhance implementation of these legal requirements and the sustainable use of natural resources, group standards for air quality management, water management, biodiversity management, rehabilitation and mine closure management, and incident management were implemented in 2010.
A strategic review of key environmental risks from Exxaro’s mining activities in 2009 highlighted:Exxaro believes conservation is becoming increasingly important, given the enormous value of biodiversity and tourism to the South African economy. Accordingly, Exxaro intends to be a mining company that leads by example in protecting, enhancing and conserving the country’s biodiversity and demonstrating that mining activities can co-exist with world-class biodiversity conservation initiatives. That way, we ensure the right of future generations to a healthy, complete and rich environment.
Under this policy, various conservation measures are being implemented that underscore Exxaro’s commitment to entrench duty-of-care principles.
| 2011 |
|
| 2010 |
|
| 2009 |
|
| 2008 |
|
| 2007 |
|
| 2006 |
|

Prior to embarking on the Lephalale housing project, Exxaro piloted five eco-friendly houses in nearby Marapong. Sustainability aspects addressed included piloting environmentally friendly building materials and appliances, such as eco-friendly bricks, zinc-fuel battery systems to power lights and small electrical appliances, to prove their cost-effectiveness for future Exxaro housing projects and the provincial housing department.
In addition, to meet housing demand in the area, Exxaro initiated the Lephalale Development Forum in conjunction with Eskom, Sasol, all levels of government and local stakeholders. The forum concentrates on infrastructure, housing, education, health and welfare services, sport and recreation facilities.
A compliance certificate was submitted with building plans for approval from the Lephalale Municipality.
This project cuts across all sustainable development areas. In the social arena, it offers mixed and affordable housing types; environmentally there is reduced requirement for energy and water; while economically it has provided skills training and small enterprise development.
In maximising the impact of a R590 million budget, the project also provided a number of benefits to the community and Exxaro employees:| 2011 | 2012 | 2012 - 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review priorities
|
Review priorities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Most of these have at least a 12-month cycle
Key: EIA - environmental impact assessment; EMP - environmental management plan; EMPR - environmental management plan report; EERF - Exxaro environmental rehabilitation fund |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The aim of this comprehensive programme is to achieve responsible and sustainable water management use across Exxaro. The programme will concentrate on relevant water-risk issues - from security of supply and water efficiency to water-cost management - and manage these to ensure current and future anticipated regulatory compliance. Exxaro also plans to create awareness of water issues through communication and training, and wider competency in water-management issues through research and skills development. Initial areas of focus include reporting and assurance, measurements and data, technology solutions and management principles.

Exxaro is investing in systems to more accurately measure water withdrawal by source at each operation. This will in turn provide a better understanding of our broader impact (water withdrawal, reduced access to water, loss of natural water resources, reduced agricultural activity) and our specific environmental impact (withdrawal impact on source, potential lowering of water table, reduced flow, draining of wetlands, downstream activities).
The group is also enhancing systems to measure total water discharge by quality and destination. This will enable us to address specific impacts of water discharge on the receiving environment, as well as other environmental issues around quality and quantity (including total dehydration of source, loss of wetlands and associated fauna and flora, degradation of the quality of the resource due to pollution).
To determine the level of reporting maturity on these factors across our operations, site visits began with Grootegeluk, Exxaro’s largest operation.
Reportable data types
A steering committee of subject-matter experts, environmentalists and members of senior management reports to the Exxaro executive committee and board sub-committee for safety and sustainable development. The programme is supported by a stakeholder engagement and communications process that will be rolled out in 2011.
One of the early successes of the programme was Exxaro’s recent submission to the first CDP Water Disclosure, a voluntary but detailed submission on water-related data that will provide valuable insight into the water strategies of many of the largest companies in the world.
While Exxaro already reports on water issues against relevant GRI indicators as well as UN Global Compact principles, and the ICMM sustainable development framework, standardised processes will enhance data from the new financial year.
During the year, some environmental groups raised issues with the JSE and in the media about mining companies’ compliance with environmental standards, and particularly about whether JSE standards for membership of the Socially Responsible Investment index needed to be raised. Exxaro was among the companies singled out for attention, citing the alleged lack of water licences at specific operations and allegedly unauthorised mining operations at another. Exxaro was able to prove to the JSE that the required water licences had been issued, and that no unauthorised mining activities were being undertaken at Arnot’s Mooifontein section. In addition, Exxaro was able to prove that an innovative solution was being implemented at Matla to preserve and minimise mining impacts of the wetland (right).
Exxaro has a proven record of environmental conservation and management, as illustrated in case studies in this report.
This unique wetland project combines an adaptation of the mining model with a 14km diversion of the Rietspruit River, a tributary of the Olifants River which in turn is a major water source for several mines in the area, including Exxaro’s Inyanda mine and New Clydesdale mine.
As a result of the controlled impacts of mining and controlled water use, the flow and functioning of the Rietspruit ecosystem has been maintained and its biodiversity protected. We believe this is a good example of mining innovation and nature working together: at Matla, we are going below the wetland using undermining, a technique typically used when a mine extends under a building, roadway or town.
To date, Exxaro has spent R31 million on constructing the river diversion and another R1 million on monitoring biodiversity in the wetland project. Monitoring will continue until 2017 when mining ends at Matla. However we will continue to monitor the performance of the wetland for a further three years after mining has ceased to record post-mining conditions. Should results be positive after this period, monitoring will be stopped.
| Business unit | Description | |
| Grootegeluk | In pit storage of stormwater run-off for plant utilisation (after pH neutralisation plant to avoid corrosion) Dewatering of the Basalt aquifer and re-use as process water The Basalt aquifer is fed mainly by seepage from the unlined pollution control dams, stockpile areas and slimes facility Water recovery from the slimes disposal facility is re-used as process water The beneficiation plant at Grootegeluk mine expansion for Medupi (GMEP) has been designed to be zero-effluent in terms of water |
|
| Matla | Excess water from underground is being considered for distribution to Eskom as process water | |
| Arnot | No formal water reclamation used in plant plan in place | |
| Leeuwpan | Water recovery from the slimes disposal facility Storm water run-off recycled and re-used via the process water dams |
|
| Inyanda | Water reclamation from the slimes facility is used as process water Stormwater run-off from the plant area is captured and returned to the plant for re-use Pit water from groundwater flow and run-off is pumped back to the dirty-water facilities for re-use |
|
| Tshikondeni | Slimes disposal with percolated water recovery for re-use in the plant area Stormwater run-off at the plant area is recycled back as process water Pit stormwater run-off is used for dust suppression |
|
| North Block Complex | Excess water from pit and stormwater run-off is collected in pollution control dams for dust suppression | |
| Zincor | Rainwater collection from roofs is used to augment process water Borehole abstraction used to draw back pollution plume and augment process water |
|
| Glen Douglas | Stormwater run-off into opencast areas used as process water in the plant area | |
| KZN Sands | Reclamation of rainwater to augment water from Umgeni Water Seepage and run-off at CPC is collected and used as process water |
|
| Namakwa Sands | Seawater is used as process water Process water is recycled from the disposal facilities and re-used in the plant |
It is a permit condition for water use licences to be audited; these audits will be coordinated through the new water management programme. As part of this process, Exxaro will regularly update its operational water balances and develop system changes to minimise consumption of raw water while preventing losses from the water reticulation system.
| North Block Complex | Tshikondeni | Glen Douglas | Rosh Pinah | Zincor | KZN Sands | Namakwa Sands | |
| Source | Municipal, boreholes |
Unwa Dam, boreholes |
Municipal | NAM-Water | Municipal,
boreholes, rainwater harvest |
Municipal (Waterboard - River abstraction) |
Olifants River (Western Cape seawater); Municipal (Smelter) |
| Major climatic region | Temperate Highveld region | Tropical summer rainfall area | Temperate Highveld region | Desert | Temperate Highveld region | Sub-tropical east coast region | Arid region |
| Arnot | Glisa | Grootegeluk | Inyanda | Leeuwpan | Matla | New
Clydesdale |
|
| Source | Eskom | Municipal, boreholes | Mokolo Dam, boreholes, pit water |
Olifants River (Mpumalanga), boreholes |
Boreholes | Eskom | Olifants River (Mpumalanga) |
| Major climatic region | Temperate Highveld region |
Temperate Highveld region |
Tropical summer rainfall area |
Temperate Highveld region |
Temperate Highveld region |
Temperate Highveld region |
Temperate Highveld region |

Radioactive materials are a potential risk at KZN Sands, Namakwa Sands and Zincor. Exxaro aims to have zero radiation incidents and to keep personal radiation exposure limits as low as possible. The group complies with the conditions of applicable authorisations and limits set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection or ICRP. This includes developing an appropriate policy, implementing radiation protection programmes to protect workers and members of the public, and enforcing an emergency preparedness policy that spans transportation and physical security procedures.
To date, there have been no breaches of Exxaro’s licence conditions issued by the National Nuclear Regulator for radioactive waste.
By year end, dry beneficiation technologies were being tested for various applications, with some already included in Grootegeluk’s Medupi designs. In addition, solid progress has been made in raising awareness of the importance of water conservation and treatment, as well as slimes treatment, across the group’s business units.
In applying this framework, particularly the emission inventory process, across our operations, it is evident that most of our ambient pollution impacts are associated with emissions of particulate matter or dust mining activities. In addition, Exxaro also operates smelting operations in its mineral sands and base metals commodity businesses. Emissions from these smelters are regulated by a registration certificate issued by the chief air pollution control officer in the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA). Emissions of concern from these smelters are particulate matter (represented as PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx).

All mining operations monitor daily fallout dust rates and results are assessed against national standards (SANS)(figure 1).
Namakwa Sands has an obligation to keep the West Coast environment as beautiful as it is, and provide a safe environment for employees. But the previous fume-extraction system had become inefficient and conditions in the furnace building were unpleasant during taps. On a calm day the red dust hanging over the furnace building was visible from a distance.
Construction of the new fume-extraction plant took 13 months at a cost of R63 million and, importantly, was completed without a lost-time injury. The plant uses the most modern filtration equipment and energy-efficient fans run at reduced power between taps. Most importantly, it improves conditions on the tapfloor.
| Level | Dust fallout rate (mg/m2/day) |
Permitted frequency | |
| Target | 300 | ||
| Action residential | 600 | Three in any year, no sequential months | |
| Action industrial | 1 200 | Three in any year, no sequential months | |
| Alert threshold | 2 400 | None. First exceedance requires remediation and compulsory report to authorities |
| Number of monthly exceedances 2010 | |||||
| Commodity | Points monitored with single-unit fallout dust bucket |
600mg/m2/day | >3 months/year | 1 200 mg/m2 day | >3 months/year |
| Coal | 58 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| Mineral sands and base metals |
36 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Business unit | No of points | Pollutant | Permitted emission rate |
Units | Assessed | Number of exceedances recorded for 2010 |
| Namakwa Sands | 2 | PM | 30 | mg/m3 (24hr average) | Bi-annually | 0 |
| 2 | SO2 | 500 | mg/m3 (1hr average) | Bi-annually | 0 | |
| KZN Sands | 1 | SO2 | 500 | mg/m3 (1hr average) | Quarterly | 0 |
| 14 | PM | 50 | mg/m3 (24hr average) | Quarterly | 2 | |
| Zincor | 2 | SO2 | 500 | mg/m3 (1hr average) | Continuous | 0 |
Although Exxaro’s operations are classified under industrial targets, some are close to densely populated areas. As such, tracking compliance against the more stringent residential limit as opposed to the industrial limit provides a standardised and more appropriate management approach to move our operations towards the long-term target of 300mg/m2/day.
The tables above give a consolidated view of our performance against air quality guidelines. In total, coal operations recorded four monthly exceedances of the industrial limit of 1 200mg/m2/day. The SANS guideline allows operations to have at most three exceedances per year without any reporting. Given the strong performance of our coal operations in 2010, the guideline industrial limit was exceeded by one month. The mineral sands and base metal operations also registered exceedances of the industrial limit for five months in 2010.
We are concentrating on improving our mitigation measures for operational activities that contribute significantly to dustfall. This will ensure fallout dust is reduced to national residential guidelines of 300mg/m2/day.
In terms of a formal biodiversity management policy, revised in 2010, group operations are mandated to ensure that conserving biodiversity and using natural resources through mining co-exist through proper planning, decision making, conservation and offsets.
The objectives of this policy focus on protecting and conserving biodiversity-rich sections of undisturbed areas, preventing or limiting destruction of Red Data faunal and floral species, and eradicating and controlling alien invasive species through practical and cost-effective management skills, programmes and action plans.
A detailed management standard was issued at the end of the review period to guide business units in implementing group policy. The standard aims to:Detailed desktop studies at all business units have been completed while specialist biodiversity assessments have been completed for Tshikondeni, Inyanda, New Clydesdale, Leeuwpan, KZN Sands and Namakwa Sands. Assessments are under way for Grootegeluk, North Block Complex and Arnot. Identification, mapping and management plans for the control and eradication of category 1, 2 and 3 species were included in the biodiversity assessments. Management plans for these species per business unit will be finalised and implemented in 2011 although implementation is already under way at Grootegeluk and KZN Sands. Marking protected trees and compiling and submitting permit applications for various developments at Grootegeluk and Tshikondeni (the only two business units where this was required to date) was conducted for various developments. All activities at Grootegeluk and Tshikondeni where protected trees were impacted in 2010 had approved permits for the removal/destruction and transport of protected trees.
At Inyanda relocation of the Red Data species Frithia humilis was completed and will be monitored until 2012. A post-graduate research project with the North West University on the ecology of the relocated species began in January 2011, in conjunction with SANBI (SA National Biodiversity Institute) and the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency.
To date, biodiversity action plans have been developed for five of Exxaro’s 17 operating units. The balance will be completed in 2011. Expenditure of around R30 million in 2010 is expected to increase as biodiversity action plans are fully implemented and declared category 1, 2 and 3 alien invader species are eradicated.
During the year, biodiversity was affected at Arnot Mooifontein where mining operations intruded on a wetland area. After a directive from the Department of Water Affairs on the haul road in the eastern pit of Mooifontein operation, we stopped using and then closed this haul road.
We have prioritised rehabilitation of the affected wetland area to improve biodiversity and ecological functionality. Measures include ongoing mitigation initiatives and offset areas of similar biodiversity functionality. Stakeholders and interested and affected parties have been duly consulted on these envisaged measures.
In terms of Exxaro’s biodiversity policy, all related risks need to be identified, assessed and prioritised for all activities at business units. This includes the control and management of all Category 1 alien invaders, the protection and management of biodiversity hotspot areas/biodiversity-rich ecosystems, conservation of fauna and flora of business units situated in or adjacent to sensitive areas such as centres of plant endemism (Fairbreeze, Rosh Pinah) sensitive ecological areas (Matla river diversion), adjacent to RAMSAR sites (Zincor) or adjacent to protected areas or areas of high sensitivity for the tourism industry (Tshikondeni).
Business units report quarterly on these indicators. By monitoring this data, rehabilitation backlogs are identified before undue financial liabilities are incurred. The goal of the environmental rehabilitation department is to budget for and schedule ongoing rehabilitation aligned with the mining plans of each business unit. Integral to this process is minimising any negative mining impacts on affected parties or the environment and communicating rehabilitation actions via established forums.
Exxaro contributed roughly R68 million in 2010 and had R502,5 million in its trust fund at 31 December 2010 for mine-closure activities. Updating and revising rehabilitation provisions annually also highlights potential rehabilitation alternatives that could decrease the closure liabilities of mines in the long term.
Closure-cost reviews were completed at eight operations, including five inactive sites. Performance assessments against the objectives of environmental management plan reports were completed for eight operations and submitted to DMR. In line with the growing government focus on rehabilitation, Exxaro is ensuring that all group business units have reviewed their rehabilitation plans (with appropriate schedules and budgets) and that these are being implemented.
During the period, the Department of Mineral Resources Mpumalanga served Arnot Colliery with a directive to submit an EMPR (environmental management plan report) performance assessment report. This is a regulatory tool introduced by the department to monitor implementation of the EMPR. It is also a requirement in terms of the Exxaro environmental liability management framework that operations conduct EMPR performance assessments, and that such assessments be reported to the department. Scheduling these assessments is done through the Exxaro environmental rehabilitation fund. The Arnot EMPR performance has since been completed and submitted to the department in Mpumalanga.
Exxaro’s North Block Complex also received a directive from the department on the need to align mining activities (including the washing plant) with the EMPR. Since the processes of updating these documents had already started in 2010, the required EMPR update was finalised and submitted to the department in Mpumalanga.

During the year, implementation of Durnacol’s social plan gained new momentum and projects such as the training centre, bakery and steelworks are now operational, underscoring solid working relationship between this community and Exxaro. Shaft-sealing and dump rehabilitation activities during the year have improved water, dust and visual impacts at Durnacol.
At Hlobane, the group policy of completing rehabilitation work manually has created job opportunities during the construction phase. Crack and subsidence sealing at Hlobane has improved water quality in the catchment area.
Current mining legislation presents a number of risks specific to mine closure. These include possible pressure from affected communities to increase the corporate contribution to mine-closure social programmes which will escalate the longer-term financial requirement. An additional risk comes from third-party applications for continued mining at mines in closure (Hlobane and Durnacol). Continued mining at these old workings are exceptionally dangerous and any incidents will have an impact on Exxaro’s image. Future liability is likely to escalate as new mining and old mining impacts cannot be separated in terms of water quality, subsidence and crack formation. With any mine closure, there is also the risk that implementing the closure plan might not address all negative impacts. Exxaro has prepared as fully as possible for these contingencies in its existing closure plans.
Four years ago, Exxaro began sponsoring the Chair in Business and Climate Change at Unisa to create a centre of excellence in business and climate change research, education and advocacy. While solid progress was made in the early years of this sponsorship, including the landmark publication of Climate Change: A Guide for Corporates (Unisa Press, 2009), the pace has accelerated considerably since the appointment of Dr Godwell Nhamo. Since August 2009, four research papers have been published, nine conference papers presented, and related courses at honour’s level proposed. The Exxaro group was used as the first of a series of case studies examining how companies intend operating in a low-carbon economy. The Exxaro study was published in 2009. Dr Nhamo is also a member of the National Business Initiative (South Africa) climate change committee working group, and a member of the Department of Trade and Industry/Business Unity South Africa climate change forum. Dr Nhamo was named Unisa’s researcher of the year in 2009, a significant vote of confidence in the chair’s activities.
Given this important progress, Exxaro has renewed its sponsorship of this chair until 2015. This will maintain the current momentum and strengthen the chair’s critical research, advocacy and tuition activities in advancing the business and climate change agenda.
From 2010, research will be streamlined to focus mainly on business and address climate policy at national, regional and international levels, including the transition to a low-carbon economy (ie issues relating to green/sustainable procurement), energy and climate change, integrated reporting and other emerging areas. Research topics will address climate change and business issues on four key thematic areas: mitigation, adaptation, greenhouse gas inventories, research and development (including breakthrough low-carbon technologies).
Reportable environmental incidents across the group are shown alongside. A total of 30 level 2 incidents occurred in 2010, and were reported to the relevant authorities. Corrective actions to remedy the incidents and prevent them from recurring were approved by authorities prior to implementation. There were no significant (level 3) incidents reported in 2010.
Fifteen of Exxaro’s 17 business units have ISO 14001 accreditation, reflecting the global industry standards in place.
| 1 | The project must be additional (ensuring the project is not claiming reductions that would already occur) |
| 2 | It must result in real emission reductions (ensuring project activity is monitored and claimed emission reductions are verified) |
| 3 | Emission reductions from the offset project must not be double-counted (the same emission reductions cannot be sold to several buyers at the same time) |
| 4 | Emission reductions must be permanent |
| 5 | The offset project should result in community benefits. |
In 2009, we installed a 300-litre solar-powered geyser at the Badirammogo Home in Olievenhoutbosch, a low-cost housing area close to Exxaro’s corporate centre. The home offers full-time care to eight elderly residents and will benefit from the significant reduction in monthly running costs.
In 2010, we planted sufficient trees in and around our operations to offset the impact of the annual report and Exxaro’s internal newsletter.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||
| Commodity business | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 |
| EXXARO COAL | 500 | 495 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Arnot | 50 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Char plant | 54 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Durnacol | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grootegeluk | 61 | 135 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Hlobane | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Inyanda | 22 | 37 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Leeuwpan | 103 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matla | 109 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Clydesdale Colliery | 94 | 72 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Block Complex | 4 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tshikondeni | 3 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MINERAL SANDS | 330 | 339 | 12 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| KZN Sands | 86 | 79 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Namakwa Sands | 244 | 260 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| BASE METALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS | 101 | 188 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Glen Douglas | 30 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rosh Pinah | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zincor | 71 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CORPORATE OFFICE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alloystream | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ferroalloys | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Head office | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R & D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 931 | 1022 | 30 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Level 1: Minor impact and/or non-compliance Level 2: Intermediate impact and/or non-compliance Level 3: Major impact and/or non-compliance |
||||||
| Business unit | Description | Receiving environment | ||
| Grootegeluk | Accidental diversion of reclaimed slimes dam water to an unlined slimes dam caused localised pollution. | Groundwater | ||
| Matla | Graves were discovered during mining-related activities; area demarcated and South African Heritage Resource Agency (SAHRA) informed. | Heritage resource | ||
| Arnot | Temporary silt damwall broke and caused slurry to run into field. | Soil and natural vegetation | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | Failure of a slimes transfer pipeline feeding the residue dam. | Soil and natural vegetation | ||
| KZN Sands - CPC | Burn-through on furnace 2 shell during a metal tap with dust and iron oxide fumes. | Air | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | Breach in berm caused sediment to wash off site into Umhlathuze River. | Surface water | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | Water from backfill cyclones breached the berm; discoloration of Umhlathuze River. | Surface water | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | Burst pipe caused slimes to spray onto neighbouring property. | Soil and crops | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | Subsoil saturated due to elevated water ingress from hydro cyclone underflow; discoloration and retarded growth of sugar cane in neighbouring field. | Subsoil and crops | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | Blocked channel caused surface runoff to neighbouring properties with damage to tomato crops. | Surface water | ||
| KZN Sands - Hillendale | HDPE pipe burst caused ROM to spill offsite. | Soil | ||
| KZN Sands - CPC | Stack emission exceeded permit requirements for particulate matter. | Air | ||
| KZN Sands - CPC | Blockage in small disintegrator delivery line caused excessive visual smoke and particulate matter emissions | Air | ||
| North Block Complex Glisa | Decant water from block B flowing into a clean water environment. | Surface water | ||
| North Block Complex Strathrae | Slurry spill into the field. | Soil and natural vegetation | ||
| Tshikondeni | Discharge of sewage. | Soil and natural vegetation | ||
| Inyanda mine | Dust concentrations exceeded air quality standards five times in 12 months. | Air | ||
| Inyanda mine | Coal sediment and contaminated water spilled into a clean environment | Surface water | ||
| Inyanda mine | Heavy rainfall caused return-water dam level to exceed lined level. | Soil and groundwater | ||
| Inyanda railway siding | Dust concentrations exceeded air quality standards once in 12 months. | Air | ||
| Inyanda railway siding | Pollution control dam overflowed twice in 12 months. | Surface water | ||
| Inyanda mine | Evaporation dam overflowed | Surface water |
Energy consumption was 4,8% lower in 2010 mainly due to the unplanned downtime on furnaces at KZN Sands.
| Saleable product (kt) | Energy/t | Electricity/t | Diesel/t | Water/t | ||||||
| Commodity business | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 |
| COAL | 44 436 | 36 412 | 0,10 | 0,11 | 0,05 | 0,05 | 0,05 | 0,06 | 0,27 | 0,31 |
| Arnot | 4 167 | 5 211 | 0,10 | 0,10 | 0,05 | 0,04 | 0,06 | 0,07 | 0,18 | 0,20 |
| Char plant | 114 | n/a | 0,20 | 0,40 | 0,16 | 0,25 | 0 | 0,14 | 0,81 | 1,70 |
| Durnacol | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Grootegeluk | 18 426 | 13 521 | 0,09 | 0,12 | 0,05 | 0,07 | 0,03 | 0,05 | 0,34 | 0,49 |
| Hlobane | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Inyanda | 1 830 | n/a | 0,09 | 0,21 | 0,01 | 0,03 | 0,08 | 0,18 | 0,47 | 1,04 |
| Leeuwpan | 3 149 | 2 585 | 0,21 | 0,19 | 0,03 | 0,03 | 0,18 | 0,17 | 0,16 | 0,16 |
| Matla | 12 336 | 11 254 | 0,05 | 0,05 | 0,04 | 0,04 | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,12 | 0,14 |
| New Clydesdale Colliery | 858 | 785 | 0,21 | 0,25 | 0,06 | 0,05 | 0,15 | 0,20 | 0,34 | 0,35 |
| North Block Complex | 3 278 | 2788 | 0,10 | 0,11 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,10 | 0,11 | 0,10 | 0,00 |
| Tshikondeni | 278 | 268 | 0,57 | 0,56 | 0,43 | 0,43 | 0,13 | 0,12 | 0,55 | 1,95 |
| MINERAL SANDS | 838 | 984 | 5,30 | 10,60 | 4,39 | 4,28 | 0,59 | 0,49 | 13,62 | 13,24 |
| KZN Sands | 499 | 659 | 3,94 | 2,98 | 3,28 | 3,49 | 0,14 | 0,11 | 18,00 | 16,86 |
| Namakwa Sands | 339 | 325 | 7,29 | 7,61 | 6,02 | 5,89 | 1,25 | 1,26 | 7,18 | 5,89 |
| BASE METALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS | 1 269 | 1 440 | 1,45 | 1,28 | 1,32 | 1,18 | 0,13 | 0,11 | 2,13 | 1,90 |
| Glen Douglas | 1 061 | 1 228 | 0,09 | 0,08 | 0,03 | 0,04 | 0,05 | 0,05 | 0,28 | 0,24 |
| Rosh Pinah | 118 | 121 | 1,86 | 1,82 | 1,32 | 1,33 | 0,54 | 0,51 | 8,73 | 9,49 |
| Zincor | 90 | 91 | 17,01 | 16,78 | 16,55 | 16,43 | 0,46 | 0,34 | 15,32 | 14,24 |
| CORPORATE OFFICE | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Alloystream | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ferroalloys | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Head Office | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| R & D | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 46 544 | 38 836 | 0,25 | 0,27 | 0,17 | 0,20 | 0,07 | 0,07 | 0,59 | 0,70 |
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
| COAL | Energy (GJ/t) | 0,1 | 0,11 | 0,09 |
| Water (m3/t) | 0,27 | 0,31 | 0,27 | |
| MINERAL SANDS | Energy (GJ/t) | 5,3 | 5,09 | 4,65 |
| Water (m3/t) | 13,62 | 13,24 | 27,00 | |
| BASE METALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS | Energy (GJ/t) | 1,45 | 1,29 | 1,28 |
| Water (m3/t) | 2,13 | 1,90 | 2,11 |
| CO2 from electricity purchased (kt)* |
CO2 from diesel (kt)** | Total CO2 emissions (kt) | ||||
| Commodity business | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 |
| COAL | 532,67 | 509,71 | 157,66 | 163,07 | 690,33 | 672,78 |
| Arnot | 51,45 | 55,86 | 17,26 | 25,29 | 68,71 | 81,14 |
| Char plant | 5,00 | 2,57 | 0,34 | 0,39 | 5,34 | 2,96 |
| Durnacol | 0,09 | – | 0,43 | – | 0,51 | – |
| Grootegeluk | 261,92 | 251,21 | 47,47 | 53,95 | 309,39 | 305,16 |
| Hlobane | 0,00 | – | 0,10 | – | 0,11 | – |
| Inyanda | 7,07 | 6,39 | 10,38 | 9,98 | 17,46 | 16,37 |
| Leeuwpan | 24,05 | 21,00 | 41,39 | 31,68 | 65,45 | 52,68 |
| Matla | 133,88 | 128,81 | 5,09 | 4,79 | 138,97 | 133,60 |
| New Clydesdale Colliery | 14,55 | 10,44 | 9,29 | 11,73 | 23,83 | 22,17 |
| North Block Complex | 2,40 | 1,44 | 23,28 | 22,81 | 25,69 | 24,25 |
| Tshikondeni | 32,25 | 32,00 | 2,63 | 2,44 | 34,88 | 34,44 |
| MINERAL SANDS | 1 002,39 | 1 170,71 | 36,86 | 35,72 | 1 039,25 | 1 206,43 |
| KZN Sands | 445,84 | 638,38 | 5,28 | 5,27 | 451,12 | 643,65 |
| Namakwa Sands | 556,55 | 532,33 | 31,58 | 30,45 | 588,12 | 562,78 |
| BASE METALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS | 455,92 | 471,45 | 12,00 | 11,39 | 467,92 | 482,83 |
| Glen Douglas | 9,73 | 12,45 | 4,30 | 4,54 | 14,03 | 16,99 |
| Rosh Pinah | 42,55 | 45,00 | 4,70 | 4,54 | 47,25 | 49,54 |
| Zincor | 403,63 | 414,00 | 3,00 | 2,31 | 406,63 | 416,31 |
| CORPORATE OFFICE | 14,08 | 13,44 | 0,03 | – | 14,11 | 13,44 |
| Alloystream | 0,46 | 1,36 | – | – | 0,46 | 1,36 |
| Ferroalloys | 4,80 | 5,30 | – | – | 4,80 | 5,30 |
| Head Office | 6,62 | 6,79 | 0,03 | – | 6,66 | 6,79 |
| R & D | 2,20 | – | – | – | 2,20 | – |
| Total | 1 990,97 | 2 151,87 | 206,52 | 210,17 | 2 197,49 | 2 362,04 |
| * Electricity purchased * 0,98/1 000 ** Diesel used * 0,00271/1 000 |
||||||