| Share prices |
Our safety and sustainable development governance model begins with meeting legislative requirements as a minimum standard. Sophisticated risk management systems and processes are then modelled around key risks for implementation at operational level. A risk-based approach also informs the way resources are allocated and used in the group to ensure ongoing progress towards and beyond legal compliance.
During the reporting period, no fines or sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations were imposed on any Exxaro operation.
Notably, AlloyStream was certified for the occupational health and safety management system according to the BS OHSAS 18001:2007 standard, for environmental management systems according to the ISO 14001:2004 standard and recertified for the updated quality management systems according to the ISO 9001:2008 standard. In the ISO 14001 audit, AlloyStream received the highest score of all companies from 27 countries included in the 2009 audit.
Notably, Namakwa Sands achieved OHSAS 18001:2004 certification, and was the first operation in the Western Cape to achieve OHSAS 18001:2007 certification. Namakwa Sands has also consistently retained ISO 14001, ISO 9001 and ISO 17025 certifications.
Safety pledge
Signed by Exxaro stakeholders in March 2009
We, at the Exxaro Resources group of companies, and all our stakeholders, in a relationship of mutual trust and respect, will further evolve our safety culture of zero harm in which we, while consciously learning from our own and others’ mistakes and caring for each other, lead with safety excellence, benchmarked against industry best practices.
Keeping our people safe
Our ultimate target remains zero injuries and, therefore, zero fatalities. To reach this goal, we have an incremental target of a 30% improvement in safety performance each year. We aim to achieve this through stringent application of management protocols, programmes and systems. Formal management-worker health and safety committees are in place at all operations, and meet regularly to ensure we reach our targets.
The strategic review of our safety practices highlighted key risks facing our group, particularly limited hazard awareness, varied safety competency and non-adherence to corporate safety standards. Collectively, these may result in the perception of Exxaro being an unsafe business — a perception that carries material risk to our sustainability.
Accordingly, we have developed a timeline to Exxaro’s desirable state that includes:| Timeline to desirable state | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2010 — 2011 | 2012 — 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO Safety Summit outcomes:
|
Review priorities
|
Review priorities
|
Although key risks differ by operation, the group’s major challenges are vehicle incidents, energy and machinery isolation, and risk awareness and discipline at all levels. Skills shortages continue to magnify these challenges and, accordingly, ensuring the group has sufficient trained people remains a priority.
Improving safety performance extends to contractors at all Exxaro operations as part of a formal programme:Exxaro has a policy in place that details the group’s approach to identifying, preparing for and responding to emergency situations affecting employees and surrounding communities. This spans all known types of emergency including fire, flood, bomb threats, etc. Emergency situations that have occurred have been well handled, demonstrating the comprehensiveness of both policy and training. A good example is the intervention to address risks associated with the outbreak of H1N1 — as a result, the outbreak had no impact on any of Exxaro’s operations.
All lost-time injuries are investigated by the relevant business unit manager, while all fatalities are investigated by a committee with the appropriate skills, headed by an independent chairman. Each business unit tracks its adherence to standards and legislation through a programme of self-assessments and corporate audits.
Exxaro set a target of zero fatalities, and an LTIFR (lost-time injury frequency rate per 200 000 hours worked) of 0,21 for 2009. Despite a steady reduction in the LTIFR from 0,52 in 2005 to 0,36 in 2007, actual performance was 0,33 in 2009. This is a 15% improvement on the LTIFR of 0,39 recorded in 2008. In risk-specific terms, the leading cause of injury was lifting and material handling. The safety of our people is fundamental to our business, and we will not rest until we achieve our safety goals through collective responsibility, commitment and ongoing focus.
The fatality frequency rate per million man-hours worked in 2009 was 0,07, compared to 0,13 in 2008. Our target remains zero, as no death is acceptable. Despite excellent safety performances at several mines, we regrettably lost three contractors during the year in an explosion at a contractor’s site at Zincor, and a colleague in a non-reportable vehicle fatality at Arnot. This case was thoroughly investigated, and the lessons learned incorporated into our safety programmes to create an injury-free work environment.
Reducing employee exposure to health risks remains a priority for Exxaro. Our risks are typical of a mining group. Business units identify, rank and quantify their risks, and then implement programmes to mitigate the impact. Workplace exposures are linked to individuals and this forms the basis of the medical surveillance programme.
The occupational health risks to which most Exxaro employees are exposed are noise and dust, and this is reflected in the occupational disease profile. Newly diagnosed cases are submitted to the compensation authorities for confirmation that they are work-related, and serve as an early indicator of the possible occupational disease burden. Accepted cases are awarded compensation.
Our targets are to:| Timeline to desirable state | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2010 — 2011 | 2012 — 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review priorities
|
Review priorities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Key: OEL — occupational exposure limit; VCT — voluntary counselling and testing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meeting mining sector targets
Dust and noise-reduction targets set by the mining industry aim to reduce the number of NIHL and silicosis cases. This depends on:
Occupational diseases
Reported cases are those newly diagnosed and submitted to the compensation authorities to confirm that they are work related and eligible for compensation. In 2009 Exxaro reported 90 occupational diseases: this is an early indicator of the possible occupational disease burden. Tracking this data indicates potential cases that could be compensated and provides an opportunity to reinforce preventive programmes.
In 2009, Exxaro had 20 occupational disease cases accepted for compensation: 11 cases of NIHL, two cases of pneumo-coniosis, one of occupational lung disease and six of occupational TB.

There has been a general decrease in occupational diseases, except for NIHL and occupational TB. Efforts to reduce employees’ high noise exposure continue. There is also increased susceptibility to TB possibly fuelled by individuals with compromised immune systems. There have been no cases of silicosis.
Given the dramatic increase in TB rates in South Africa and in the mining industry in recent years (below), it is important to manage TB and HIV holistically through better surveillance, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. At each business unit, TB education initiatives reach employees at least once a year. These include information on symptoms and the importance of early diagnosis for effective treatment. Adhering to this new standard is expected to reduce the risk of developing, contracting and spreading multiple- and extensively drug-resistant TB in Exxaro.
Tuberculosis in the mining industry
TB is a growing health problem globally and in South Africa, as reflected in the 80% increase in case notification of this disease in the local population over the last five years. This indicates the rising burden of disease in the community, inability of the public health system to fully control it, and high incidence of HIV/Aids given that over 60% of TB patients are also HIV-positive. As such, a successful HIV/Aids programme is critical to the management and success of a TB programme.
The high rate of occupational TB in the mining industry is largely due to exposure to airborne pollutants — especially silica dust — as well as poorly ventilated working and living conditions. The relatively long treatment period (six months) can lead to interrupted treatment with a defaulter rate of over 10%, which in turn can cause multiple drug-resistant TB strains.
TB is curable. It needs to be proactively managed using wetting methods to reduce dust levels, and wearing respirators. In addition, infection control, good diagnostic capacity, education on the disease, a good health infrastructure and resources are required. In the mining industry, periodic medical surveillance provides an opportunity for routine TB screening.

Hazardous chemical substances
A new hazardous chemicals standard was issued to the group in 2009 in compliance with legislative (Hazardous Substances Act 15 of 1973) and international requirements (such as OHSAS 18001; ISO 14001; SANS 10232, 10234 and 10238). In terms of this standard, each business unit has to develop a site-specific procedure, database and training programme to eliminate and reduce the possibility of harm to Exxaro employees and contractors by the end of 2010.
H1N1 (swine flu)
There was minimal impact of H1N1 on Exxaro, with only three cases reported across the group and the individuals recovered fully. Exxaro will continue to monitor and manage potential risks as the flu season approaches.
HIV/Aids
The prevalence of HIV/Aids across Exxaro is currently estimated at 12%. At the end of 2009, 58% of our employees had participated in voluntary counselling and testing. This compares very favourably with our target to get at least 50% of all employees at each site to test for HIV.
A major awareness campaign during the year helped group employees understand the importance of their HIV status and provided information to help them make appropriate lifestyle choices such as joining a treatment programme or keeping their status negative. Exxaro’s HIV/Aids service offers employees support focused on four key areas:
Prevention:
All South African operations have environmental management programmes (EMPs) as required under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) and the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). North Block Complex’s EMP expired and is being updated, while the EMP amendment to Arnot’s Mooifontein is also under way. All EMPs are key indicators in ensuring that Exxaro becomes a sustainable business. Exxaro also adopts the precautionary approach recommended by NEMA in evaluating the environmental impacts of business opportunities.
To enhance implementation of these legal requirements and the sustainable use of natural resources, standards for air quality management, water management, biodiversity management and rehabilitation management have been completed and will be implemented in 2010.
The in-house environmental specialist unit has increased its scope of services by dedicating a resource to oversee the environmental authorisation process.
As such, we have developed a timeline to Exxaro’s desirable state that includes:
| Timeline to desirable state | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2010 — 2011 | 2012 — 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review priorities | Review priorities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * Most of these have at least a 12-month cycle | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Key: EIA — environmental impact assessment; EMP — environmental management plan; EMPR — environmental management plan report; EERF — Exxaro environmental rehabilitation fund | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water-use definitions have been standardised across business units via the Exxaro water management standard. This group-wide standard guides business units in tracking compliance against legal and reporting requirements for water.
Water efficiency projects at ExxaroThese projects have been integrated into the new Exxaro water-efficiency project scheduled for completion in 2010. |
||
| Business unit | Description | |
| Grootegeluk |
|
|
| Matla |
|
|
| Arnot |
|
|
| Leeuwpan |
|
|
| Inyanda |
|
|
| Tshikondeni |
|
|
| New Clydesdale |
|
|
| North Block Complex |
|
|
| Zincor |
|
|
| Glen Douglas |
|
|
| KZN Sands |
|
|
| Namakwa Sands |
|
|
| North Block Complex | Tshikondeni | Glen Douglas |
Rosh Pinah | Zincor | KZN Sands | Namakwa
Sands |
|
| Source | Municipal | Unwa Dam, boreholes | Municipal | NAM-Water | Municipal, boreholes, rainwater harvest |
Municipal | Olifants River (Western Cape), seawater |
| Arnot | Glisa | Grootegeluk | Inyanda | Leeuwpan | Matla | New Clydesdale |
|
| Source | Eskom | Mokolo Dam, boreholes, pit water | Mokolo Dam boreholes |
Olifants River (Mpumalanga), boreholes |
Boreholes | Eskom | Olifants River (Mpumalanga) |

Although this process is still in its infancy, the outcome from the first phase of data analysis will assist in identifying gaps, risks and assessing different business units’ water-use patterns, available water resources, and potential for developing water reclamation schemes. Phase 1 will be completed in July 2010
| Developing a strategic water management plan | |||||
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | |||
| Company-wide assessment of water supply, water management and water liabilities to establish the size of the water resource that may be available to the water business. | Water market and business opportunities. Learning from worldwide trends. This will establish local and regional demand for water by users able to purchase the water. | Business case for Exxaro entering the water market as a viable enterprise development. | |||
In applying this framework, particularly the emission inventory step, across our operations, it is evident that most of our ambient pollution impacts associated with emissions are particulate matter or dust from mining activities. In addition, Exxaro also operates smelting operations in its mineral sands and base metals commodity businesses. Emissions from these smelters are regulated by a registration certificate issued by the chief air pollution control officer in the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA). Emissions of concern from these smelters are particulate matter (represented as PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide
(NOx).

All our mining operations monitor daily fallout dust rates and results are assessed against the national standards (SANS) set out in figure 1.
Figure 1: National standards (SANS)| Level | Dust fallout rate (mg/m2/day) |
Permitted frequency | ||
| Target | 300 | |||
| Action residential | 600 | Three in any year, no sequential months | ||
| Action industrial | 1 200 | Three in any year, no sequential months | ||
| Alert threshold | 2 400 | None. First exceedance requires remediation and compulsory report to authorities |
| Points monitored with single-unit fallout dust bucket |
Average number of exceedances – 2009 | ||
| Operation | 600mg/m2/day | As % of total | |
| Coal | 60 | 9 | 13 |
| Mineral sands and base metals | 36 | 3 | 8 |
Exxaro has implemented a management key performance indicator that tracks compliance against the “action residential limit”. Even though our operations are classified under industrial targets, we recognise that some operations are close to densely populated areas. Tracking compliance against the residential limit provides a standardised management approach that aims to move our operation into the long-term target of 300mg/m2/day (figure 2).
On average, the operations in the coal commodity business exceeded the 600mg/m2/day limit 13% of the time in 2009. Most of these exceedances were recorded in the winter and spring months. The mineral sands and base metals commodity business exceeded the limit 8% of the time.
As part of the process of developing biodiversity management plans for each business unit, a comprehensive study was undertaken to determine vegetation types on all land held by Exxaro and quantify greenhouse gas reduction as a result of vegetation.
The boundaries and vegetative mapping were completed in 2009 and preliminary tier 1 carbon values determined. Agriculture, forestry and other land-use practices were included to provide for a more accurate and complete carbon footprint, accounting for the various business units and the group as a whole. Based on aerial photographs and GIS land use and vegetation maps, a carbon vegetation type map for each operation (mines and smelters) was compiled.
The carbon quantities captured within the 32 types of vegetation in land under operational control are estimated to be around 30 million tonnes. The data on vegetative carbon stocks within various land use practices assists Exxaro’s environmental practitioners in executing their environmental and rehabilitation activities. A summary of biodiversity management is shown.
| Figure 3: Performance of smelters | ||||||
| Business unit | No of points | Pollutant | Permitted emission rate |
Units | Assessment frequency | Exceedance of permitted emission rate (2009) |
| Namakwa Sands | 2 | PM | 30 | mg/m3 (24hr average) | Bi-annually | 0 |
| 2 | SO2 | 500 | mg/m3 (1hr average) | Bi-annually | 0 | |
| 2 | NOx | 700 | mg/m3 (1hr average) | Bi-annually | 0 | |
| KZN Sands | 15 | PM | 50 | mg/m3 | Quarterly | 5 |
| Zincor | 2 | SO2 | 24 | mg/m3 | Continuous | 1 |
Group operations are mandated to ensure that biodiversity conservation and the use of natural resources through mining co-exist through proper planning, decision-making, conservation and offsets.
The objectives of this policy are focused on the protection and conservation of biodiversity-rich areas of undisturbed areas, preventing or limiting destruction of Red Data faunal and floral species and eradication and control of alien invasive species by means of practical and cost-effective management skills, programmes and action plans.
Click here to view the Biodiversity management table.
Business units are already reporting on these indicators each quarter. By closely monitoring this data, rehabilitation backlogs are identified before undue financial liabilities occur. The goal of the environmental rehabilitation department is to report against set ongoing rehabilitation budgets per business unit, in terms of volumes and finance.
Exxaro contributed R38 million in 2009 and had R422 million in its trust fund at 31 December 2009 for mine closure activities. Updating rehabilitation provisions annually also informs potential rehabilitation optimisation alternatives that will decrease the closure liabilities of mines in the long term.
During the year, closure-cost reviews were completed at eight operations. Five inactive sites have been included in this review process. Performance assess-ments against EMPR (environmental management plan report) objectives were completed for four operations and submitted to DMR. Others are scheduled for 2010.
The table sets out reportable environmental incidents across the group. A total of 20 level 2 incidents were reported during 2009. All level 2 incidents were reported to the relevant regulatory authorities. Corrective actions to remedy the incidents and prevent them from recurring were approved by authorities prior to implementation. There were no significant (level 3) incidents reported in 2009.
Environmental incidents – level 2 |
|||||||
| Business unit | Level | Description | Receiving environment | ||||
| Inyanda | 2 | Overflow of contaminated water into a clean water area | Water | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Stacks exceeded APPA permit requirements | Air | ||||
| Grootegeluk | 2 | Pollution control dam not functioning well — spilling into clean areas | Water | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Excessive visual smoke and particulate matter in atmosphere | Air | ||||
| Namakwa Sands | 2 | Contaminated water spillage into clean areas | Soil | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Contaminated water overflow to a river due to blocked drainage trench | Water | ||||
| Grootegeluk | 2 | Pollution control dam overflow to clean areas | Water | ||||
| Inyanda | 2 | Soil pollution from coal spillage | Soil | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Clogging of dewatering cyclones systems resulting in water pollution | Water | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Stacks exceeded APPA permit requirements | Air | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Overflow of contaminated water into surrounding community properties | Water/soil | ||||
| Namakwa Sands | 2 | Water and soil pollution caused by flooding of sewage treatment plant | Water/soil | ||||
| Namakwa Sands | 2 | Water from the mine damaged farm road on neighbouring farm | Soil | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Stacks exceeded APPA permit requirements | Air | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Leaching of run-of-mine pipeline — in situ material from the operation into a neighbour’s property | Water/soil | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Water from the mine damaged neighbouring property | Water/soil | ||||
| Namakwa Sands | 2 | Erosion of sensitive area due to high rainfall | Soil | ||||
| KZN Sands | 2 | Release of rainwater in controlled manner into a river to prevent dam wall failure | Water | ||||
| Inyanda | 2 | Coal and hydrocarbon spillage | Soil | ||||
| Inyanda | 2 | Overflow of water from the dam to neighbouring properties | Water/soil | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||
| Business unit | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 |
| Coal | 495 | 458 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Arnot | 75 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Char Plant | 23 | n/a | 0 | n/a | 0 | n/a |
| Grootegeluk | 135 | 208 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Inyanda | 37 | n/a | 4 | n/a | 0 | n/a |
| Leeuwpan | 28 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matla | 51 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New Clydesdale Colliery | 72 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Block Complex | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tshikondeni | 48 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Mineral sands | 339 | 201 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| KZN Sands | 79 | 130 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Namakwa Sands | 260 | 71 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Base metals and industrial minerals | 527 | 338 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Glen Douglas | 47 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rosh Pinah | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zincor | 141 | 101 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 361 | 997 | 20 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
Level 1: Minor impact and/or non-compliance
Level 2: Intermediate impact and/or non-compliance
Level 3: Major impact and/or non-compliance