16.   CONCLUDING REMARKS

SRK has conducted a comprehensive review and assessment of all material issues likely to influence the future operations of the Material Properties. The LoM Plans for the Material Properties, as provided to and taken in good faith by SRK, have been reviewed and adjusted by SRK where considered appropriate. SRK also note that the impact of any adjustments (both positive and negative) made by SRK to the underlying LoM Plans have not been subjected to re-planning.

      

16.1

Equity Value

 
The Equity Values below are dependent on two valuation scenarios.
 

Table 16.1 Summary Equity Value and Share Price: Equity Value ratios for Kumba

Valuation Scenarios Units  
Equity Value    
Scenario I (ZAR/share) 106.49
Scenario II (ZAR/share) 115.53
     
Share Price/Equity Value    
Kumba Share Price – 1 January 2006 (ZAR) 102.00
Scenario I Ratio 0.96
Scenario II Ratio 0.88

Table 16.2 Summary Equity Value: Equity Value for Eyesizwe

     
Valuation Scenarios Units  
Scenario I (ZARm) 2,007
Scenario II (ZARm) 2,228

Table 16.3 Summary Equity Value: Equity Value for Exxaro

Valuation Scenarios Units  
Scenario I (ZARm) 14,354
Scenario II (ZARm) 16,536

SRK note the relatively low impact of the valuation of Mineral Rights, Exploration Properties and non-LoM Mineral Resources. The valuation of such assets is a highly subjective and SRK note that a lower level of certainty must be ascribed to this as compared with the Enterprise Values as reported herein.

 

H G Waldeck, PrEng
Partner and Principal Mining Engineer
SRK Consulting

Roger Dixon
Corporate Consultant
SRK Consulting




  back to top